Vinay Katiyar from the judgment Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) freshly asked the federal government to adjust the name and identity the the monument and acknowledge the a Hindu ruler constructed it.
You are watching: Which fact about the taj mahal is not true
His statement has been commonly reported in the media, prompting plenty of right-wing teams to assistance him.
Reality check verdict: over there is no convincing proof to earlier the claim. Rather the vast majority of historians and also the Indian federal government agree that the mausoleum is a fine instance of Indo-Islamic architecture.
India's main recorded background says that Mughal (or Mogul) ruler Shah Jahan constructed the Taj Mahal in storage of his queen, Mumtaj Mahal.
The Mughals, who initially came from main Asia, ruled most of what is now India and also Pakistan in the 16th and 17th Centuries.
The Mughal realm consolidated Islam in southern Asia, and also spread Muslim arts and society as well together the faith through the region.
The archaeological Survey that India, the custodian of the country's monuments, describes the Taj Mahal as "the pinnacle of Mughal architecture".
The government's main Taj Mahal website likewise says "the period of Mughal architecture best exemplifies the maturity that a style that had synthesised Islamic design with its indigenous counterparts".
"By the time the Mughals developed the Taj, despite proud of your Persian and also Timurid roots, lock had concerned see themselves as Indian," it adds.
Historian Rana Safvi called the ugandan-news.com that "there is no question" that revisiting the background of the Taj Mahal, and that there is no proof a temple ever existed ~ above the site.
"There to be a haveli
"Shah Jahan officially to buy the haveli indigenous him. An main farman
Ms Safvi says a publication titled Taj Mahal: The Illumined dig by we Begley and also ZA Desaihas compiled an anthology of these documents.
"From such publications I realised just how well-documented the structure of the mausoleum was. I usage these translations to existing my disagreements that the Taj Mahal was built on the land where Raja Jai Singh had actually a mansion and that there is no mention of any spiritual building on that land," she said.
"Recorded background proves beyond any kind of doubt that the Taj Mahal was constructed by shah Jahan in memory of his queen," that said.
School text books and various federal government websites additionally describe the monument as an example of Indo-Islamic architecture.
Mr Katiyar is not the very first person who has actually demanded that the history of the Taj Mahal must be changed.
The so late right-wing historian PN Oak referred to as the monument Tejo Mahal in his 1989 book titled Taj Mahal: The True Story.
He said in the book that the monument was initially a Hindu temple and palace constructed by a Rajput ruler.
Mr Oak thought that Emperor shaman Jahan seized the framework after a battle, and later change the name it the Taj Mahal.
image source, Getty Images
Writer Sacchidananda Shevde, who worked very closely with grandfather Oak, said ugandan-news.com Marathi that the government should appoint a team of professionals to "uncover the truth".
But the government's main Taj Mahal website states the monument represents "a style that combines facets from Persian, Indian, and also Islamic architecture styles".
Both mr Katiyar and also Mr Shevde argue that the Taj Mahal comprises a variety of Hindu architecture symbols.
"There is a crescent moon on the pinnacle of the Taj. In Islamic culture, the moon is tilted, this crescent moon is not tilted, it's concerned the Shaivaite
"There is likewise a kalash
See more: How Did The 1980S Burger Court Treat Gender Discrimination ?
"Architecture constantly evolves and imbibes impacts from many cultures. Mughal design is no different. The kalash is crucial symbol for Hindus, yet you likewise see that in Mughal monuments, including the Taj Mahal. Leaves and also flowers have also been shown in countless Mughal buildings," he told the ugandan-news.com.