*

*
*
*
*
*

Educational ServicesBCIA practice TestsDistance LearningVideo WebinarsAbout UsGlobal Neurofeedback InitiativeResources

The Rorschach – Reliability and Validity

Thomas F. Collura

The Rorschach is a psychometric device that offers a series of inkblots presented to a subject, and elicits linguistic responses regarding what the separation, personal, instance sees in the images. It is administered by one examiner that asks questions and also records answers. Based ~ above the subject responses, a collection of variables have the right to be determined, which are provided to define their personality follow me a collection of miscellaneous axes. That is intended come elicit accurate info of diagnostic worth in clinical work. Over there is an substantial literature ~ above the Rorschach, yet it remains, after practically 100 years, a controversial instrument. This report discusses the reliability and validity the the Rorschach, based ~ above a evaluation of appropriate literature.

Based upon released reports, the Rorschach can be concerned as a reliable and valid psychometric instrument, given that certain conditions space met. One is that it is administered by one experienced, competent, and also trained examiner. One more condition is the a known and also structured method of assessment be used. The the structured methods, there are an ext than one option. The most widely known system is the considerable System (CS) defined by Exner (1993). A final problem is that it be applied with a suitable populace and v an ideal purpose of diagnosis or assessment, because that which validity has been demonstrated.

You are watching: The rorschach inkblot test has ________ reliability and ________ validity.

Reliability depends on the capability to achieve a offered measurement consistently (Weiner & Greene, 2008). Viglione and also Taylor (2003) especially examined this worry using the substantial System. Castle reported the in their very own study, among 84 raters assessing 70 Rorschach variables, there was a strong inter-rater reliability, particularly for the base-rate variables. They also reviewed 24 previously published papers, every reporting assorted inter-rater reliabilities. Many of these studies reported reliabilities in the range of 85% come 99%. As well as inter-rater reliability, test-retest dependability is an additional important consideration. Exner (as quote in Groth-Marnat, 2009, pp. 389-90) report reliabilities indigenous .26 to .92 end a 1-year interval considering 41 variables; 4 of them were over .90, 25 between .81 and also .89, and also 10 below .75. However, the most unreliable variables were attributed to state changes. It was further provided that the many relied upon factors, ratios and percentages, were amongst the most reliable. Therefore, it can be concluded the the substantial System deserve to yield high reliability when supplied under the conditions used in these studies.

Validity relies on the ability of a test to measure up the constructs that it is purported to measure up (Wiener & Greene, 2008). Validity in this situation can be evaluated by comparing the Rorschach through clinical data or v other created tests of personality. Weiner (2001), because that example, proclaimed that the Rorschach has a validity result size “almost identical” come the MMPI (Weiner, 2001, p. 423). Groth-Marnat (2009, p. 391) has pointed out that outcomes of validity studies on the Rorschach have actually been mixed, however are confounded by various determinants including the “type that scoring system, suffer of the scorer, and form of population.” early studies created validity scores of .40 to .50, however later studies discovered scores together low as 0.29. However, such researches were more confounded through variables such together age, variety of responses, verbal aptitude, education, and also other confounding determinants that were not controlled.

More current studies the validity have met with combined results. Smith et al. (2010) evaluate the validity that the Rorschach in assessing the impacts of trauma using a different system, the “Logical Rorschach” developed by Wagner (2001, together cited in smith et al., 2010). They found “equivocal” findings, however indicated the the LR “may have some validity in the assessment of trauma-related phenomena.” wood et al. (2010) evaluated the Rorschach using a meta-analysis of 22 studies including 780 forensic subjects, in an attempt to different psychopaths from nonpsychopaths. They report a typical validity coefficient of 0.062 making use of all variables, and also a validity the 0.232 making use of the aggressive Potential index. Castle concluded that their findings “contradict the see that the Rorschach is a clinically sensitive instrument because that discriminating psychopaths native nonpsychopaths.” (Wood et al., 2010, p. 336). Another an outcome was report by Lindgren, Carlsson, and Lundback (2007) in i m sorry they found no agreement between the Rorschach and also a self-assessed personality utilizing the MMPI-2.

This leaves the concern then, the if the Rorschach is reasonably reliable, what is that measuring if the is not the very same dimensions as, because that example, the MMPI, or forensic psychopathology? Hilsenroth, Eudell-Simmons, DeFife, and Charnas (2007) did find, because that example, the the Rorschach was reliable in separating psychotic disorder patient from non-patients, and from personality disorder patients. Castle concluded the the test had clinical meaningfulness for diagnosis and also assessment in this population. In one more study, Liebman, Porcerelli, and also Abell (2005) reported a validity coefficient that 0.71 in 150 adolescents when to compare the Rorschach aggression variables through the Violence Rating scale – Revised. Porcelli and also Mihura (2010) evaluate the Rorschach Alexithymia range (RAS) as a details index to determine alexithymia in a psychiatric population. They studied 219 patients and also reported a hit rate of 92%, sensitivity of 88%, and a specificity the 94%. These findings taken together confirm the validity of the Rorschach, but likewise highlight the prestige of identify the scoring mechanism and populace when assessing the validity that the Rorschach.

The Rorschach has definitely had that is detractors. Grove, Barden, Garb, and also Lilenfeld (2002) presented a particularly an unfavorable summary check out of the Rorschach, and concluded the it have to not generally be admitted in court testimony. Lock based this conclusion mainly on a meta-analysis that a big number that studies, and made use of such monitorings as the it is “engulfed in intense scientific controversy,” that there have been “heated exchanges between advocates and also critics,” and “a majority (indeed, in every likelihood, a substantial majority) the the pertinent scientific community does not see the RCS together a reliable system.” They cite weaknesses such as poor norms, overestimation of psychopathology and also maladjustment, and also unacceptable reliabilities in the .45 come .56 range. However, these worldwide indictments carry out not necessarily use to a specific practitioner or group using the Rorschach in a continual manner through a certain population, through adequate control of variables. This evaluation would also have consisted of earlier research studies which, as pointed out by Rose, Kaser-Boyd and also Maloney (2001), offered nonstandard administration and various scoring systems. Therefore, this conclusions apply more to inadequacies in the existing basic of published literature and also the opportunity of widespread inconsistency in Rorschach research and application, no to the absence of potential reliability and also validity that the test once it is properly applied.

Therefore, the conclusion have the right to be made that the Rorschach is reliable once evaluated making use of a defined rating scale and an appropriate collection of examiners. Inter-rater reliability and also test-retest reliability deserve to be agree under this conditions. Validity can additionally be demonstrated, yet it depends on further components that relate primarily to the population and to plan use. In particular cases such together forensic psychopathology or together an different to the MMPI, it has actually been demonstrated to have actually questionable validity in studies. In various other cases, such as trauma, it has actually been displayed to have actually some prove validity. In tho others, such together psychiatric issues of psychosis and perception or violent adolescents, that has higher demonstrated validity. My an overview conclusion is the the Rorschach, as soon as properly used, deserve to be reliable. That is validity relies on the specific populace and plan use, and this deserve to vary from reasonably poor to rather good. Weiner (2001, p. 423) as such makes a fair and also applicable statement once he concludes that the Rorschach “works really well because that its intended purposes.”

References

Exner, J.E. (1993) The Rorschach: A substantial system: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (3rd ed.). Brand-new York Wiley.

Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of emotional assessment (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: man Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Rose, T., Kaser-Boyd. N., & Maloney, M. P. (2001). Essentials that Rorschach assessment. New York: man Wiley& Sons, Inc.

See more: What Rhymes With Mean - Words And Phrases That Rhyme With Mean

Liebman, S. J., Porcerelli, J., & Abell, S. C. (2005). Reliability and also Validity of Rorschach Aggression Variables with a Sample that Adjudicated Adolescents. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 85(1), 33-39. Doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_03

Lindgren, T., Carlsson, A., & Lundbäck, E. (2007). No agreement in between the Rorschach and also self-assessed personality traits acquired from the substantial System. Scandinavian journal Of Psychology, 48(5), 399-408. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00590.x

Musewicz, J., Marczyk, G., Knauss, L., & York, D. (2009). Existing assessment practice, personality measurement, and also rorschach usage by psychologists. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 91(5), 453-461. Doi:10.1080/00223890903087976

Porcelli, P., & Mihura, J. L. (2010). Assessment of alexithymia with the Rorschach substantial system: the Rorschach Alexithymia scale (RAS). Newspaper Of Personality Assessment, 92(2), 128-136. Doi:10.1080/00223890903508146

Viglione, D. J., & Taylor, N. (2003). Empirical assistance for interrater integrity of rorschach considerable system coding. Newspaper Of Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 112-121.

Weiner, I. R. (2001). Advancing the science of psychological assessment: The Rorschach Inkblot an approach as exemplar. Mental Assessment, 13(4), 423–432.

Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M., Allen, K., Lilienfeld, S. O., Garb, H. N., & Wildermuth, J. L. (2010). Validity that Rorschach Inkblot Scores because that Discriminating Psychopaths from Nonpsychopaths in Forensic Populations: A Meta-Analysis. Mental Assessment, 22(2), 336-349. Doi:10.1037/a0018998

Smith, S. R., Chang, J., Kochinski, S., Patz, S., & Nowinski, L. A. (2010). Initial validity of the reasonable rorschach in the evaluate of trauma. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 92(3), 222-231. Doi:10.1080/00223891003670174